[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:05:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> But AFAIK BABYL files use a single encoding for the whole file, and
>> since around Emacs-21.x that single encoding is supposed to be
>> emacs-mule (and I seem to remember that the BABYL file is supposed to
>> contain an annotation at the very beginning saying it's using
>> emacs-mule, if so).
> Arguably, it is a Rmail 22 bug that some BABYL files are encoded
> using raw-text.
So you're saying that when Emacs-22 wrote those files, it used raw-text?
And that Emacs-22's Rmail reads those files properly?
And that Emacs-22's Rmail reads those files with raw-text?
Stefan
- Rmail and the raw-text coding system, Mark Lillibridge, 2011/01/14
- Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/14
- Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system, Mark Lillibridge, 2011/01/14
- Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/14
- Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system, Mark Lillibridge, 2011/01/16
- Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/17
- Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system, Mark Lillibridge, 2011/01/17
- Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system, Mark Lillibridge, 2011/01/19