[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:52:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Please don't forget that it is Alt+F4 we have been discussing, not M-f4.
>>
>> Please educate me: why is that important? where it makes a difference?
>
> You can have another key than Alt as Emacs META. I use the w32 windows
> key as Emacs META, since this makes it much easier to reach the menus.
Thanks. That's indeed a good reason for not binding M-f4 for doing the
job of Alt-F4.
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, (continued)
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stuart Hacking, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/19
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/20
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/20
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Óscar Fuentes <=