Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer'

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> B_(buf, XXXX)
>> That sounds even better, yes.
> If by "better" you mean "less readable and more confusing"...

Apparently it's a question of taste, but I feel it's good when the
symbol I see in the declaration of a field/variable is the same
(literally, and not uppercased or anything) as the one I see in the code
that accesses this field/variable.


        Stefan