[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: attribute warn_unused_result
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: attribute warn_unused_result |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:47:54 +0100 |
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Chad Brown <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> Gnulib's ignore-value module is designed for that. I installed
> the following:
>
> ..and it broke the W32 and nextstep builds (at least) again.
So what is wrong here, Paul? We have suggested that you make a
separate branch for this. Why don't you do that?
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, (continued)
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Lennart Borgman, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Chong Yidong, 2011/02/05
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Stefan Monnier, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Stefan Monnier, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Lennart Borgman, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Andy Moreton, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/03
Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/03