[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
-DWEBHACKDEVEL for Gnus (was: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk.)
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
-DWEBHACKDEVEL for Gnus (was: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk.) |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:33:32 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 05:49:15 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
>> Is it OK to bring the change back with gnus-overrides.texi and
>> -DWEBHACKDEVEL? Or are there objections still?
EZ> I still think it's wrong to have a versioned file that needs to be
EZ> modified for some optional build.
I absolutely agree. But that is no longer the case.
gnus-overrides.texi is a static file now, intended for generic
Gnus-related @set commands and currently empty.
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:06:23 +0100 address@hidden (Peter Münster) wrote:
PM> I know that make can do whatever you want,
Oh, I wish that was true, but `make' is horribly limited. Unfortunately
it's just good enough to make hacks on top of it popular.
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:50:28 +0100 Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
AS> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> You mean, without any files to @include in the manuals? If so, that's
>> what I suggested way back in the thread, but was told (I think by Ted)
>> that the included file allowed for more than just @set directives, and
>> that this additional flexibility, which is impossible to replace with
>> the -DFOO options to makeinfo, is anticipated to be needed in the
>> future.
AS> Which is of course a bogus argument, since you can always add more
AS> @ifset controls to the texi file.
Andreas, can you explain which argument is bogus? There are three in
the cited paragraph. If you're referring to my justification for
gnus-overrides.texi that Eli explained, can you explain how you'd rather
do it? For example, how would you set 20 GNUS_x variables efficiently
for all the Gnus manuals (keeping in mind the same process has to work
for Gnus and Emacs both)?
Thanks
Ted
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., (continued)
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2011/02/05
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2011/02/05
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Ted Zlatanov, 2011/02/07
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/07
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Peter Münster, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Andreas Schwab, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Peter Münster, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/08
- -DWEBHACKDEVEL for Gnus (was: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk.),
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: -DWEBHACKDEVEL for Gnus, Peter Münster, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Andreas Schwab, 2011/02/05
- Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL (was: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk.), Ted Zlatanov, 2011/02/05
- Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/02/05
- Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/02/05
- Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/07
- Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/07
- Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/02/06