[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A better autogen.sh
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: A better autogen.sh |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:37:15 -0400 |
Glenn Morris wrote (on Tue, 15 Mar 2011 at 18:09 -0400):
> I know; except I cannot remove src/config.in because the MS Windows
> build uses it IIRC.
Or maybe just MS DOS? Can't remember...
If we went ahead with this, I think it would also be possible to set
AC_PREREQ in configure.in back to 2.62, if desired. 2.62 had some
fixed bugs that were relevant to Emacs. But AFAIK, all bumps of
AC_PREREQ after that were only in an attempt to prevent the version
churn of configure in the Emacs repository.
- A better autogen.sh [was Re: Still unable to build trunk], Glenn Morris, 2011/03/07
- Re: A better autogen.sh [was Re: Still unable to build trunk], Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/08
- Re: A better autogen.sh [was Re: Still unable to build trunk], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2011/03/10
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/15
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/15
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/15
- Re: A better autogen.sh,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/15
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, joakim, 2011/03/16