[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A better autogen.sh
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: A better autogen.sh |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:40:23 +0200 |
> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:36:08 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Should the things you propose to move there be in release tarfiles?
> Because the things I would move to "autogen/" should not (because
> releases get "proper" configure etc pre-built)
The config.in intended to be edited by config.bat for the MS-DOS build
should be in the release tarballs.
- Re: A better autogen.sh, (continued)
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
Re: A better autogen.sh [was Re: Still unable to build trunk], chad, 2011/03/28