[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change to bzr build instructions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Change to bzr build instructions |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:18:04 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:04:24 +0100
>
> > Why were these files deleted and then created anew in autogen/? Why
> > not "bzr mv" them instead? Do we really want to lose their history?
>
> One thing that makes sense about git: moving files is exactly the same
> as deleting and recreating them.
Please stop the git propaganda here. The advantages and disadvantages
of git vs bzr in this regard are well known and can be found with
Google.
- Re: Change to bzr build instructions, (continued)
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Andreas Schwab, 2011/03/22
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Andreas Röhler, 2011/03/22
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2011/03/22
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/25
- Re: Change to bzr build instructions, David Kastrup, 2011/03/25
- Re: Change to bzr build instructions,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Leo, 2011/03/25
- Re: Change to bzr build instructions, David Kastrup, 2011/03/25
- Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/25
- Re: Change to bzr build instructions, David Kastrup, 2011/03/25
- Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/25
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Andreas Röhler, 2011/03/25
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Davis Herring, 2011/03/27
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/25
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, David Kastrup, 2011/03/25
Re: Change to bzr build instructions, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/25