Re: [PATCH] Unconditional quit on SIGUSR2

[chad]

On Mar 28, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:

As covered in another branch of this thread, C-g *is* often ambiguous. It's inherently racy when we allow normal quitting of background work. Users would send this signal to Emacs only after noticing an uninterruptable hang.  Is that not clear?

If the method works out in practice, how would people feel about a patch to emacsclient adding a flag to send such signals?

*Chad