[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 05:18:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 11:34:42 +0200 David Engster <address@hidden> wrote:
DE> Here's what I observe:
DE> * The 'mapcar' method always works.
DE> * If you don't byte-compile, the 'loop' method will also work.
DE> * If you byte-compile, the 'loop' method will fail with Emacs24 *before*
DE> the lexbind merge. After the lexbind merge, it works as expected.
Of course, I found and reported all of this right before the lexbind
merge. Argh.
I took your mapcar version and used it. Everything works now, and will
work in older Emacs versions too.
DE> Note that the :initform evaluation will not work with the EIEIO version
DE> which ships with Emacs23. I remember some discussions regarding this
DE> issue; it's probably best to use an explicit constructor. I included it
DE> in the test case (you have to uncomment it). When using the class w/
DE> constructor, you can also compile it under Emacs23, and the 'loop'
DE> method will then also fail.
When I use the explicit constructor (commented out right now), many
tests fail. Do you want to take a look at that? It's the only
remaining merge blocker.
My changes are in the new "tzz-gnus-registry-rewrite" branch. I won't
merge it until we're sure it works in Emacs 23 and 24. I'll write the
manual changes and ChangeLog at that time too.
DE> The funny thing is that Emacs24 *after* the lexbind merge cannot run
DE> that byte-compiled code from Emacs23; is that to be expected?
I would assume major versions introduce binary incompatibilities, so I
wouldn't worry about that.
Ted
- bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/04/01
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/04/01
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/04/01
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/04/01
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, David Engster, 2011/04/02
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, David Engster, 2011/04/03
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, David Engster, 2011/04/04
- Message not available
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, David Engster, 2011/04/05
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/04/05
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, David Engster, 2011/04/05
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/04/05
- Message not available
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/04/05
- Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/04