[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: splitting ChangeLogs
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: splitting ChangeLogs |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:01:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> copy ChangeLog Changelog.11
>> ;; edit and trim both files
>> bzr add ChangeLog.11
>> bzr commit -m "..."
>>
>> or
>>
>> bzr mv ChangeLog ChangeLog.11
>> copy ChangeLog.11 ChangeLog
>> ;; edit and trim both files
>> bzr add ChangeLog
>> bzr commit -m "..."
>
> The latter, I think.
Shouldn't ChangeLog should keep its current file-id, so that eg merged
entries from emacs-23 go to the correct file? The current lisp/ChangeLog
has a log that goes back to 1999.
PS Why does it matter if ChangeLogs get larger than 1MB?
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, (continued)
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/07
Re: splitting ChangeLogs,
Glenn Morris <=
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Message not availableRe: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Glenn Morris, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06