[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: splitting ChangeLogs
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: splitting ChangeLogs |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:36:27 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> So what am I missing?
The logs and diffs.
Since I'm not Andreas, I guess I can't leave it at that.<wink>
If before for splitting ChangeLog, bzr log ChangeLog shows N
revisions, after either of the procedures shown, one of ChangeLog and
ChangeLog.11 has 1 revision, and the other has N+1. bzr diff does
nothing useful with the newly added file. With a hypothetical bzr cp,
both would have N+1, and bzr diff would work on both.
This isn't terribly useful for ChangeLogs whose entries are (almost)
immutable, of course, but it is very useful in cases where a source
file containing multiple functions is refactored into two files.
I could have sworn bzr had this feature, but maybe I'm thinking of
Mercurial (which definitely has it).
- splitting ChangeLogs, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/07
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Glenn Morris, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Message not availableRe: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06