[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter
|
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
|
Subject: |
Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:24:27 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:54:06 +0200 Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
JM> Since someone mentioned a goal of being able to edit a 2GiB
JM> file, I thought people here would be sensitive to an API policy
JM> that renders that goal unreachable on some systems.
Just to add my vote: I think Emacs should be able to open and edit 2 GB
and larger files, although IIUC the API policy discussed here doesn't
remove that possibility.
Ted
- oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/11
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/11
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/11
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, David Kastrup, 2011/04/11
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/11
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/11
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, David Kastrup, 2011/04/11
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/11
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/12
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/12
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/04/12
- Large file support (was: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/12
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2011/04/14
- Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/11
Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/11