Re: Redirecting standard output

[Stefan Monnier]

> I'm not sure what the syntax would be, though, since a string parameter
> to REAL-BUFFER already means "use the buffer with this name"....
> eurmh...  well, off the top of my head, we could use keywords for the
> complex case.  That is BUFFER could be, er, something like

> (:stdout (:file "/tmp/foo") :stderr (:buffer "bar"))

> Backwards compatibility would be easy to maintain.

Sounds fine to me, as long as the patch is simple enough,


        Stefan