[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Redirecting standard output
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Redirecting standard output |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:57:27 +0300 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:19:57 +0200
>
> I was trying to play around with the pbmplus programs from Emacs, and
> that turns out to be somewhat awkward. The programs all send output to
> STDOUT, and there seems to be no way to easily redirect STDOUT with
> `call-process'.
You mean, redirect to a file? Why do you need that?
Anyway, redirecting to a temp buffer and then writing that buffer to a
file should be good enough, right?
> You can usually work around this by using `shell-command' or the like,
> but when dealing with directories that contain arbitrary characters,
> getting the quoting right can be somewhat icky. (Although I found
> `shell-quote-argument' just now while writing this. :-)
So, if you use shell-quote-argument, is there still a problem?
- Re: Redirecting standard output, (continued)
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Davis Herring, 2011/04/21
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/04/21
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/22
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/04/23
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/23
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Jan Djärv, 2011/04/24
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/04/30
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/04/30
- Re: Redirecting standard output, Glenn Morris, 2011/04/21
Re: Redirecting standard output, Michael Albinus, 2011/04/21
Re: Redirecting standard output,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Redirecting standard output, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/04/21