Re: Redirecting standard output

[Michael Albinus]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> I'm not sure what the syntax would be, though, since a string parameter
>> to REAL-BUFFER already means "use the buffer with this name"....
>> eurmh...  well, off the top of my head, we could use keywords for the
>> complex case.  That is BUFFER could be, er, something like
>
>> (:stdout (:file "/tmp/foo") :stderr (:buffer "bar"))
>
>> Backwards compatibility would be easy to maintain.
>
> Sounds fine to me, as long as the patch is simple enough,

This would also require changes in Tramp, for process-file (and
start-file-process, if start-process is changed as well). Not a big
deal, just to mention it ...

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.