Re: more url-utils?

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Sat, 14 May 2011 12:32:55 +0200 address@hidden wrote: 

j> Would the defun below be suitable to include in url-util?
j> You nearly always want to work with the data part of the document.
j> The code snippet below occurs a lot in different packages.

j> A wrapper that downloads a file(like curl or wget) would be nice also.

j> (defun org-feed-skip-http-headers (buffer)
...

Yes to both, but like Lars I think the header-skipping should be an
option for the current API and not a new function.

Ted