Re: INLINE -> inline (was: md5 broken?)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 15:47:13 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> On 05/28/11 12:35, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I'm saying that we should have only
> > one of "INLINE" and "inline", not both.
> 
> Yes, that makes sense.  Since 'inline' is standard and is widely
> used in other GNU packages, it makes sense to use it in Emacs too.
> That will shorten the Emacs source code and make it easier for
> others to understand.  Here's a proposed patch to do that.

Looks good to me, thanks.