Re: more url-utils?

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> (funcall #'parse-page (url-fetch "http://google.com";))
>> [...]
>>> (url-fetch "http://google.com"; 'parse-page)
>> I.e. the callback takes a single argument.
> Which would be a list of buffer/info/headers?

For example, yes.

> Presently the callback is called with the current buffer set to the
> return buffer.  If the async is to have the same signature as the sync,
> then that's not really practical.

The sync case can set-buffer as well, so both choices are possible
without breaking consistency.  I don't have a strong preference
either way.


        Stefan