Re: more url-utils?

[Stefan Monnier]

>> The sync case can set-buffer as well, so both choices are possible
>> without breaking consistency.  I don't have a strong preference
>> either way.

> So calling (url-fetch "http://google.com";) would change the current
> buffer?  I think that sounds like very surprising behaviour... 

Oh, wait, no, because I wanted url-fetch to insert the result in the
current-buffer, rather than creating a brand new buffer.


        Stefan