[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: what is the convention for `info' and `Info'?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
RE: what is the convention for `info' and `Info'? |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:57:38 +0900 |
Drew Adams writes:
> Resending - no response. Can one of the maintainers speak to this? What is
> the
> intention/design/convention?
>
> > Library info.el has a mix of vars, faces, and functions with
> > names that begin with `info' or `Info'. What is the convention
> > here - when to use one or the other? There doesn't seem to be
> > any rhyme or (non-hysterical) reason.
Dunno about rhyme, but somewhere in space-time there is a comment to
the effect that use of the usual prefix capitalized reduces the number
of completions you have to deal with. Thus commands that are bound to
a key sequence and unlikely to be used with M-x have the prefix
capitalized.
Whether this consideration is still relevant I have no opinion, except
that the only Info command I use with M-x is Info-goto-node (which is
quite useful as an @ref in code, too). But there was a reason at one
time.