Re: pop-to-buffer and friends new behavior or bug?

[martin rudalics]

> On a similar note, I find annoying the new behavior of deleting a frame
> when its last buffer (whatever that means) is deleted, at least for
> frames which I explicitly open. Is that intended?

Yes.

> Perhaps there should
> be some kind of option for this (more convenient than advicing
> window-deletable-p).

I'll write that tomorrow.  The option will allow to

- never delete a frame in such a case,

- delete the frame only if it has been created by one of the
  `display-buffer' family of functions,

- always delete the frame even if it was created by C-x 5 2 (the present
  default).

martin