Re: bzr help, please

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> Of course not.  But that's what the code currently does (and since the
> code does various things at the end of the command, fixing it requires
> splitting this "rest" into a part that will still be done at the end of
> the command (e.g. bury the buffer) and another that will be deferred to
> the process sentinel).  And since that's in the generic code, this
> requires some care so as not to break other backends.

Yeah, splitting (complicated) code into sentinels can be rather tricky.

I hope that somebody gets sufficiently annoyed by this anti-productive
synchronous behaviour that they fix it, though.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/