Re: New build process?

[David Kastrup]

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Tim Cross <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Andreas Schwab
>>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> Tim Cross <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> a typo - their quite common you know. Context usually helps to
>>>>>> recognize them. In this case, autogen is probably the most likely
>>>>>> candidate :)
>>>>>
>>>>> What has autogen to do with emacs?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> autogen.sh then if you must be pedantic about it,
>>>
>>> You wrote: "Previously, you ran autoget and now you run ./autogen.sh"
>>> (with typo fixed), now you claim: "Previously, you ran autogen.sh and
>>> now you run ./autogen.sh".
>>>
>>> That does not make sense to me.
>>
>> And it is not what he has written at all.
>
> In which way does it differ?

I fail to see how I could answer this more authoritatively than the
original mail.  It is not like it has magically vanished from the
archives, even if you managed to delete your personal copy.

-- 
David Kastrup