[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default
From: |
Mohsen BANAN |
Subject: |
Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:20:42 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:08:39 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> said:
>> From: James Cloos <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>> Copyright: Copyright 2011 James Cloos
What the heck is this -- Copyright?
This list is in the realm of Copyleft.
>> OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
>> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:10:23 -0400
>>
>> >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>>
EZ> Can you show me the relevant portion of the Summary buffer?
>>
>> . [ 3: ➤ address@hidden ] العربيه
>> . [ 14: Eli Zaretskii ] Re: bidi-display-reordering is now
non-nil by default
>> . [ 399: Eli Zaretskii ] Re: Memory leak due to bidi?
>>
Eli> Thanks. The problem happens if the Subject is followed by a line
Eli> count of the message. Perhaps that happens only if the summary format
Eli> is customized, I don't know Gnus enough to tell.
Yes.
This is what is happening.
And in a previous message to James, I pointed
directly to this:
>>>>> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:52:04 -0700, Mohsen BANAN <address@hidden> said:
Mohsen> James,
Mohsen> ...
Mohsen> Separate from that, the gnus-summary-line-format
Mohsen> should remain customizable. On a larger screen, mine is:
Mohsen> (setq gnus-summary-line-format ":%U%R %B %s %-60=|%4L |%-20,20f
|%&user-date; \n")
Mohsen> That means, directionality can be triggered by
Mohsen> different fields.
Therefore, for the Summary buffer paragraph
direction should be locked into left-to-right --
not nil.
And to get the formatting (alignment) right, any field
in gnus-summary-line-format that could be R2L
needs the LRM. As it can mess other fields -- as
previously shown.
Thanks.
...Mohsen
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, (continued)
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, محسن بنان, 2011/08/02
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, James Cloos, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Mohsen BANAN, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, James Cloos, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, James Cloos, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, James Cloos, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default,
Mohsen BANAN <=
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, main, 2011/08/03
Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/02
Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2011/08/01
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Mohsen BANAN, 2011/08/02
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/04
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Kenichi Handa, 2011/08/04