[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: display-buffer-alist simplifications
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: display-buffer-alist simplifications |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Aug 2011 06:42:05 -0700 |
> >>> I'm not sure why you're so concerned about this
> >>> reuse-window behavior of special-display-popup-frame.
> >>
> >> Because I had some very hard time here discussing this
> >> with a user who can't live with such behavior.
> >
> > And yet he wants to use dedicated frames? Can you give some more
> > details, because that sounds pretty odd.
>
> That person can't use `special-display-popup-frame' because it doesn't
> work correctly on his system. Drew uses `special-display-popup-frame'
> without dedicating frames IIRC. The only person insisting on the
> dedicated feature is you. And you still didn't give me an answer why
> you need it.
I'm not following this too well; sorry.
Not sure what you mean by Drew not dedicating frames, in the context of
`special-display-popup-frame'. I thought special-display buffers were always,
by default, displayed in dedicated windows. AFAIK, I don't change that default
behavior. And I do want all of my special-display windows/frames to be
dedicated.
I use `special-display-buffer-names' for two particular buffers (*Help*,
*Completions*). In addition, I have `special-display-regexps' set to ("[
]?[*][^*]+[*]"), so buffers named *...* are all special-display. Their
windows/frames are always dedicated.
Maybe what you meant was not in the context of special display? It is true that
for ordinary (non special-display) buffers I do not use dedicated
windows/frames. (IIUC, that is different from what Stefan does.)
(Ignore if this reply isn't helpful - I'm not sure I understand what's being
discussed here. Just trying to clarify what I do in my code.)
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, (continued)
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, martin rudalics, 2011/08/05
- RE: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Drew Adams, 2011/08/05
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, martin rudalics, 2011/08/06
- RE: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Drew Adams, 2011/08/06
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, martin rudalics, 2011/08/07
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/05
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, martin rudalics, 2011/08/06
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/07
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Tim Cross, 2011/08/08
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, martin rudalics, 2011/08/08
- RE: display-buffer-alist simplifications,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/08
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, martin rudalics, 2011/08/09
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/09
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, martin rudalics, 2011/08/10
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Juri Linkov, 2011/08/05
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/05
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Juri Linkov, 2011/08/07
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/07
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Juri Linkov, 2011/08/08
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/08