RE: display-buffer-alist simplifications

[grischka]

Drew Adams wrote:
> Attempts to order such things strictly are misguided.
> [and]
> Some default ordering is fine, but there should be no
> attempt to prevent code from overriding user settings etc.

Note that overriding is just that: an attempt to enforce strict
order.  Therefor "no attempt to prevent code from overriding"
means nothing else but to support misguided attempts to order.

> There is code and there is code.  Not all code that overrides a 
> saved user setting is doing something the user does not want.

Which then would be code that overrides the user's settings in
order to do what the user wants, right?

--- grischka