[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Rethinking count-words-region
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Rethinking count-words-region |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:49:28 -0700 |
> Better yet to bind `M-=' to a new command with a general name
> like suggested `count-stats' that will take care of different
> region activation cases and report all possible counts.
1+ for changing the name.
And I propose we get rid of any default binding for the command.
Users can bind it if they like.
This is a waste of (a) a good, repeatable chord (just hold it down), (b) one
that is also usable in a terminal (via `ESC ='), and (c) one that is mnemonic
for lots of things that involve _equality_ or _comparison_. `=' is not mnemonic
for _counting_ anything.
This command does not need to be bound to a key by default - anymore than, say,
`cd'. It happens to still hang around from a time when there were more keys to
spare and fewer useful commands that we might want to bind.
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, (continued)
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/08
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/08
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, chad, 2011/10/08
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08