Re: smtp crap

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> I've just changed it so it doesn't mess with message any more
> (especially since it wasn't done right) and it offers an OS-oblivious
> 3-way choice (using completing-read).

Reading the patch, it looks good except for the apparently oblivious
3-way choice:

+              (insert "Emacs has not been set up for sending mail.\n
+It can be told to send mail either via your favorite mail client,
+or via the system's mail transport agent (\"sendmail\"), if any,
+or it can send email on its own by configuring the SMTP parameters.\n

Should the "sendmail" option be off the table if the system doesn't have
a sendmail executable?  (I.e., Windows and OS X.)

I haven't actually tried the code, so I may be misreading the patch...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/