[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-breaking hyphens
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: non-breaking hyphens |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:00:15 +0200 |
> From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:39:35 -0400
>
> I'm not sure I understand the goal of `nobreak-char-display'. Is it for
> warning the user when there is an ASCII look-alike character that isn't
> really ASCII? I guess that's mainly to avoid issues with source code?
Yes, probably. But I'm only guessing here. Can you find any traces
of discussing this in the archives?
> If so, handling only U+A0 and U+AD would be incomplete, as you say.
> Also, the name and documentation of `nobreak-char-display' is misleading
> or incomplete---it shouldn't be limited to non-breaking or shy
> characters, since there are many other non-ASCII lookalikes like U+2010
> (the "true" hyphen), U+2002 (the "en space"), and U+2007 (the "figure
> space").
I agree.
> I'm guessing the reason U+A0 and U+AD are treated specially is that
> those characters happened to be in Latin-1 (i.e. hysterical raisins).
Most probably.
- non-breaking hyphens, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/17
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/17
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/17
- Re: non-breaking hyphens,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/18
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/18
- RE: non-breaking hyphens, Drew Adams, 2011/10/18
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/19
- RE: non-breaking hyphens, Drew Adams, 2011/10/19
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/19
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/18
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/19
- Re: non-breaking hyphens, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/19
- RE: non-breaking hyphens, Drew Adams, 2011/10/19