[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:30:18 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> In any mode, each key-sequence should do one well established thing, not
> performing alternate commands based on read-onlyness. Exceptions should
> be justified individually.
But in read-only buffers, self-inserting characters are useless,
they can't do what they are intended for. So why not allow them
to do more useful things, e.g. `q' to run `quit-window'?
Actually this is what `view-read-only' does when set to non-nil.
I don't propose to change its default value to non-nil now,
but at least it's worth thinking about.
Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/23
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/24
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/24
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/24
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/25
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/25