[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
From: |
Jambunathan K |
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:43:25 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (windows-nt) |
Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
>> Martin recently introduced the command names
>>
>> split-window-above-each-other -> C-x 2
>> split-window-side-by-side -> C-x 3
>>
>> for which split-window-{vertically|horizontally} are now aliases.
>
> How about:
>
> split-window-and-stack-horizontally
> split-window-and-stack-vertically
>
> or
>
> split-window-and-arrange-horizontally
> split-window-and-arrange-vertically
I like Tim's suggestion.
Another variation of my earlier suggestion would be
split-window-and-tile-horizontally
split-window-and-tile-vertically
Since windows are always tiled but never stacked or arranged, so to
speak.
--
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3,
Jambunathan K <=
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Deniz Dogan, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26