[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:06:06 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
> split-window-like-🀱
> split-window-like-🁣
I like that ;-)
This said, I agree with Michael that it'd be good if the name made it
clear which window is the new one (I don't care much whether it uses
"split" or not, but at least "split" makes it clear that something
existing will be affected, whereas "new" can make it sound like
existing windows will stay unchanged).
So maybe split-window-bottom and split-window-right.
Stefan
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/29
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/29
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/29
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/30
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/30
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/29
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lluís, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lluís, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/27