[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
Barry Warsaw |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:42:10 -0400 |
On Oct 26, 2011, at 06:15 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>Hi, Barry!
Hi Alan!
>> split-window-by-drawing-along-a-line-from-east-to-west
>> split-window-by-drawing-along-a-line-from-north-to-south
>
>> :)
>
>I think I'm with you on this one, Barry.
At least it's unambiguous. :)
>Now I've got some bugs to fix. (Fancy lending a hand? ;-)
Oy!
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, John Yates, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Dave Abrahams, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Tim Cross, 2011/10/28
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Barry Warsaw, 2011/10/26
What is ISO? (was: C-x 2 and C-x 3), Juri Linkov, 2011/10/28