[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: smtp crap
From: |
chad |
Subject: |
Re: smtp crap |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:48:35 -0700 |
On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Drew Adams wrote:
> This is nothing but a regression - reporting a bug with `emacs
> -Q' has never been a problem in past releases. Why burden and confuse users
> now?
I have personally seen dozens, of emacs bug reports sitting stuck in local mail
queues, with the user having no idea that the bug never made it beyond the
local workstation.
I am not the only one to report this kind of problem.
This type of configuration is (as near as we can tell) at least as common now
than it was then.
This has been mentioned several times in the various discussion threads.
*Chad
- Re: smtp crap, (continued)
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, Adam Sjøgren, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap,
chad <=
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, chad, 2011/10/26
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, Tim Cross, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/26
Re: smtp crap, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2011/10/08
smtp crap, Miles Bader, 2011/10/07