[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:25:38 -0700 |
> > copy-window-below, copy-window-above,
> > copy-window-right, copy-window-left
>
> One copies to an existing object. But clones (to) a new object. So
> something like: clone-window-dock-right, clone-window-dock-below
>
> It implies that the current window is cloned first and the
> newer window gets docked to the right of or below the "older" window.
No. "Copy" means copy: duplicate. Whether a copy overwrites an existing object
or not does not affect whether the operation is copying.
Yes, the destination of copying is sometimes hidden, as in copying text to a
(hidden) clipboard. But copying always means duplication in some form.
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lluís, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lluís, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, John Yates, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Dave Abrahams, 2011/10/28