[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:05:04 +0900 |
Paul Eggert writes:
> Sorry, I'm lost. As I understand it, the
> executable in a traditional Unix-like system has
> storage laid out in this order:
We don't live in a traditional world anymore. We have SELinux,
randomized base addresses, and the Hannibal Lector "Slice 'Em & Dice
'Em" version of GNU ld to deal with, as well as a few "legacy"
environments that don't deliberately try to mess with the heads of
people who used to use BASIC to "poke" 8080 instructions into memory.
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, (continued)
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/10
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Andreas Schwab, 2011/11/10
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/10
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/10
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/10
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/10
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/13
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/10
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Andreas Schwab, 2011/11/10
- Re: VIRT_ADDR_VARIES, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/10