Re: epa command names

[Jason Rumney]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm thinking of a way for packages to say "if `mail-encrypt' is matched
> by the user's input, then include `epa-mail-encrypt' in the list of
> completion candidates".  This would handle conflicts very
> straightforwardly since if we have a second rule "if `mail-encrypt' is
> matched by the user's input, then include `superduper-mail-encrypt' in
> the list of completion candidates" M-x mail-encrypt TAB would simply
> provide both options as valid completion candidates.

Something like Android Intents perhaps?  Not only accessible via
completion, but any elisp package that wants encryption should be able
to say "encrypt-region" and hook into whatever suitable encryption
providers the user has installed.  And could ELPA be enhanced to
provide an index of suitable packages for when a user does not have an
appropriate extension installed?