[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: epa command names
From: |
Thierry Volpiatto |
Subject: |
Re: epa command names |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:41:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't much like this option because of the inability to handle
> conflicts. I'd much rather make M-x a bit more permissive such that M-x
> mail-encrypt falls back to epa-mail-encrypt (probably via completion).
>
> An aliasing method like this could be a good method
> if it is limited to certain names for which we want it.
>
> It loop in command list and does (string-match pattern "command_name").
> This allow to do:
> M-x encrypt
> which will match all commands _containing_ "encrypt"
>
> I do not want such eager completion. Natural abbreviations
> that we specific want to encourage, such as
> `encryot-file' for `epa-encrypt-file', should not depend
> on a general mechanism that tries to abbreviate everything.
anything will never match "encryot-file", just try it to have an idea of
what it does and doesn't.
http://repo.or.cz/w/anything-config.git
--
Thierry
Get my Gnupg key:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997
- Re: name prefixes [was: epa command names], (continued)