[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows' "split status"
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Windows' "split status" |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:55:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> Quite. Lots of docstrings talk about invariants, because this is really
> useful. Even something like the description of what `right-char' or
> `newline' do are invariants.
An invariant is a property (or a formula) that is valid when Emacs starts
and is preserved by every atomic step in any execution of Emacs. The
description of what a function does is not an invariant (unless you mean
that the execution of Emacs leaves the description itself alone).
> None of them should eschew talking about
> those invariants simply because they are not atomic
What is an atomic invariant?
> from the POV of the Emacs core.
martin
- Re: Windows' "split status", (continued)
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/23
- Re: Windows' "split status", Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/23
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/24
- Re: Windows' "split status", Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/24
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", Nix, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", Nix, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status",
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Juri Linkov, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", Juri Linkov, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/17