Re: GnuTLS for W32

[Richard Riley]

Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:

> 2012/1/5 Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:
>
>> Not at all.  It's just a convenience based on our desire to take
>> responsibility for the security of the software we provide.
>
> Starting with the fact that we shouldn't be providing that software in
> the first place...
>
>> It will be configurable and transparent when possible, but yes, at some
>> point it may ask you once.
>
> Even if I don't use, and don't want to use, and don't plan to use, and
> don't even want to know that the binary somehow included, the GnuTLS
> DLL?
>
>> If we have a W32 installer I'd make it a checkbox during the install.
>
> If someone creates an installer for Emacs, I don't care what the
> defaults are.

Maybe not, but just about everyone else will. Its why they are
"defaults" : sensible choices.

>
>     Juanma
>