Re: GnuTLS for W32

[Stefan Monnier]

> What I've now propsed, after Chong clarified the maintainers' position,
> is the same service, enabled by default but with no packages (so an
> interested user only has to customize one variable and it does nothing
> otherwise).  I think that's the middle ground we've been looking for.

> I only need to know, from Stefan or Chong, if that proposal is OK and if
> it should go into the current trunk or if it should wait until 24.1 is out.

I don't see a problem with it, but it's too late for 24.1.


        Stefan