Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:41, martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:

> It would be weaker than t and stronger than other non-nil values.

Well, yes, but at the end, strong, weak, or intermediate dedications
are just ways to define how pop-to-buffer, switch-to-buffer, etc.
react when confronted with changing the buffer for that window. At
some point, wouldn't it just be easier to have an alist mapping
buffer-switching functions vs. dedication values, that each
buffer-switching function would look at? At a minimum, it would make
setup easier, I think.

> Let's add this for Emacs 24.2 then.

Great.

    Juanma