[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Feb 2012 22:24:17 +0100 |
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 21:48, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 20:10:50 +0100
>> Cc: Angelo Graziosi <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>>
>> > That means unnecessary complications for the volunteers who produce
>> > the binaries, see the recent threads here (about GnuTLS, but not only
>> > about it). For starters, we need to provide sources as well, and that
>> > might be tricky legal-wise.
>>
>> I have not been following this particular thread, but my understanding
>> is that only a link to the relevant sources is needed now - if we can
>> guarantee that this works. (This was my understanding of a message
>> from RMS quite some time ago. I might have misunderstood it, though.)
>
> You misunderstood.
If you think so then please explain to me what RMS meant here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-05/msg00430.html
- Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Christoph Scholtes, 2012/02/04
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/02/05
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/05
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/02/06
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/06
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/06
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/02/06
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/02/06
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/06
- Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/02/06