Re: CL package serious deficiencies

[Nix]

On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman told this:

> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:06, Nix <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman verbalised:
>>
>>> There are things that do not work if you include cl.el at run time.
>>> You may not notice the problems and tracking it down has been quite
>>> difficult some times.
>>
>> If so, these are either bugs in cl.el, or bugs in the conflicting
>> packages, and should surely be fixed, rather than simply trying to avoid
>> using cl.
>
> Fixing the bugs would be better yes. Anyone interested can do that.

Well, if you find out what the problems are, I'll see about fixing them.

> But no one has said that cl.el should not be used. I have not seen any
> problems when the instructions for its use are followed.

Since those instructions amount to 'don't use it except at compile-
time', this is not incredibly surprising.

-- 
NULL && (void)