Re: CL package serious deficiencies

[Nix]

On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman stated:

> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:23, Nix <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman spake thusly:
>>
>>
>> So as a result, if one of us wants to use `cadr' in ordinary Lisp
>> functions that are part of Emacs, we can, but if we want to use `caddr',
>> we can't. Now does that restriction make any sense at all? I'd say it
>
> I am using caddr quite a lot. Without any whining byte-compiler or
> other problems... ;-)

Ah, there's a macro implementation I overlooked 'cos I have cl loaded at
runtime :)

-- 
NULL && (void)