Re: CL package serious deficiencies

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:

> There are things that do not work if you include cl.el at run time.  You may
> not notice the problems and tracking it down has been quite difficult some
> times.

Can we move those breaking definitions into another file, say cl-ext.el, and
then allow library authors to require 'cl at runtime?  There are a lot of
useful routines in cl.el which are not harmful to other code.

John