Re: CL package serious deficiencies

[Stefan Monnier]

> Sure.  One downside is that this means that the intricate code in
> bytecomp.el can't be removed (surely not until use of cl-clean, or
> whatever we call it, becomes second nature to elisp writers).

It could be simplified, tho, to just deprecate the use of (require 'cl)
altogether in favor of the new names.  Of course, this wouldn't be
convenient for packages that want to work on older Emacs and XEmacs
as well.


        Stefan