Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:31:22 -0500 Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> wrote: 

TZ> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:26:02 +0800 Jason Rumney <address@hidden> wrote: 
JR> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
>>> I still think Emacs bugs should be simply reported through a HTTP (REST
>>> or whatever) call.  That would cover the most users and we can use
>>> confirmation e-mails to avoid spamming.

TZ> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:37:08 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> 
wrote: 

SJT> Why can't we have both?

TZ> I'd love that: sendmail or SMTP for those who want it, and HTTP for
TZ> those who need it.

TZ> The web form would take some work for the confirmation e-mails, but
TZ> surely it would be worth it?  Would it help if I put it together?

Ping?  Anyone interested in getting this going?

Ted