[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows 64 port
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Windows 64 port |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:08:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0 |
On 03/27/2012 05:47 AM, Fabrice Popineau wrote:
> 2012/3/1 Paul Eggert <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
>
> > - unsigned long int magic; /* Magic number to check header
> integrity. */
> > + uint64_t magic; /* Magic number to check header integrity. */
>
> Not needed for Windows 64, since the magic number fits in 32 bits.
>
> If it fits in 32 bits, then it shouldn't be long in first place?
Yes, it'd be reasonable to change this. However, any such change
is independent of the Windows 64 port (as it would be just
as reasonable to change it to 'unsigned int' for x86-64 GNU/Linux too),
and so it should be considered as a separate patch.
- Re: Windows 64 port, (continued)
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Andreas Schwab, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Andreas Schwab, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/03/23
Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/22
Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/27
- Re: Windows 64 port,
Paul Eggert <=